• One of the biggest problems that waits for the technology that has been selected for the construction of its SIP house is the inaccurate SIP panels. Everyone cares about the strength and durability of the SIP at home. The inaccurate panels (vacant and (or) from the non-proper foamstyrene) completely eliminate this issue and the construction money will be spent at least as much as the industrial panels.

Very often there are artisanal shackles of the terrible quality of the sticker:

It's dangerous to build from such panels. It's written a lot, but the flow of artisanal panels on the market doesn't make sense. Many people are buying the cost of building these products.

The generally accepted recommendation is to give careful consideration to the choice of producer. The supplier or contractor may be requested to show the production and related documents (details). Denial in any form clearly indicates problems. There's no better way.

Attempts to pull the plug are not always an opportunity to properly assess the strength of the adhesion. The breakthrough on foam polystyrol occurs, and it's not in a proper glued plate, if the foam is bad. Furthermore, verification will in any case be random, and one poorly glued panel may be destroyed.

The strength of the SIP of the panel depends largely on the strength of the foam. The substitution of PCB-25 on PCB15 reduces the strength of the shell at least twice! The most severely affected by this closure and the rooftops from the SIP of the panels.

The penopolistyre mark is defined by the GAS. The TP fomentopolistry, despite a beautiful trade name, is most likely not to reach the required 25 stamps for GOST classification.

Council: If the production of the SIP of panels is in fact industrial, not in words, other than OSB-3 certificates, the SBS and glue, you will be required to provide a certificate of conformity for the product itself - the SIP panel. The authenticity of the certificate is hard to verify. The absence of such a certificate is a serious reason to think well before giving money.

• In the absolute majority of cases, the two types of foundation, on the vintage joints and the small-scale deep-seated ribbon, have solved the problem of a reliable Canadian house in Podmoskovje. By choice of foundation here.
• If you make a concrete swain (lower depth) under the easy Canadian house on the foundation Pachinist Ground, better in TEISE technology (with lower swai width) and High Grower (with the deceleration between the shark and the ground).

That's right in theory. In practice, underwater IPR at home Buronabic swai is often made without enlargement, and often the shark relies on the ground (low stack).